Siberian Light
Blog > Unify or die – the stark choice facing Russia’s liberals

Unify or die – the stark choice facing Russia’s liberals

Yabloko and SPS performed so poorly in the recent Duma elections that both are on the verge of extinction. They face a stark choice of merging, or dying.

Yabloko and SPS performed so poorly in the recent Duma elections that both are in danger of extinction.

Finacial meltdown

Yabloko garnered just 1.59% of the popular vote in December’s Duma elections and the Union of Right Forces (SPS) received a mere 0.94%, which effectively renders both parties as non-entities on the national political scene. Not only did they both fail to gain the 7% of votes needed to secure a place in the Duma, they failed to even reach the 3% required to qualify for free airtime in the run-up to the election. As a result, they’ll have to pay for the airtime they used – approximately $8 million apiece.

As a result, both parties are heavily in debt. No-one in Yabloko HQ will reveal the exact figures, but senior Yabloko member Alexei Melnikov has indicated that the party’s debt currently stands at 5 times its current annual budget of $1.8 million. SPS meanwhile are reported to be more than $8 million in debt.

Of the two, perhaps SPS is in the stronger position to come out fighting – their links to Russian business will be a great help when it comes to fund-raising – but the future looks bleak for both parties, and I wonder how they can possibly survive another electoral beating of this magnitude.

Internal party politics

Both parties are clearly agonising over their defeats, but it is far from clear that anything much will actually change.

SPS logoNikita Belykh had the good grace to resign as leader of the Union of Right Forces (SPS). He cited the party’s poor performance at the polls – SPS gained just 0.94% of the vote – and his own strategic blunder of not taking a tough stance against the Kremlin until it was too late.

Unfortunately, perhaps, for the concept of personal accountability, he was re-elected at the SPS Party Congress yesterday.

The Party Congress also decided to nominate the party’s co-founder Boris Nemtsov as their candidate for the upcoming Presidential election, demonstrating pretty conclusively that not much is actually going to change at the top for the next few months at least.

Yabloko logoAt Yabloko, meanwhile, things look more interesting – even if not particularly sensible. Rumours are circulating that Grigory Yavlinsky their long-time leader, may be facing a challenge.

Underlining this was the party’s decision to back Vladimir Bukovsky as their Presidential candidate. Although perhaps positive in that it shows some diversity, I can’t help but think that a party that chooses a man who lives in London as its Presidential candidate is on the fast track to political self destruction.

Unification – the only option left?

There has been plenty of talk in the past few years about a merger between Yabloko and SPS, to shore up their decaying futures. But, for the most part, such talk has been of the hopeful pie in the sky variety.

There are some proud personalities involved in Russia’s liberal politics, and everyone fears that they would lose their own identity in a merger. Even today, Boris Nemtsov of SPS is completely opposed to the idea of a merger with Yabloko:

“Unification on the basis of Yabloko is no unification at all,” Nemtsov said, dismissing the prospect of joining up with the party as “complete nonsense.”

If he, and Yabloko, want to carry on along their current path, well, that’s fine I suppose. But they should walk in the full knowledge that the path they are on heads straight to the nearest cemetery.

Graves in SnowIf Russia’s liberals want to have an impact on national politics, they absolutely have to muster enough votes to get into the Duma. Neither SPS nor Yabloko, as has been demonstrated clearly this December, have a cat in hell’s chance of doing it alone.

Leonty Byzov, head of the analytical section of state polling agency VTsIOM, along with other analysts, estimates that around 10-12% of Russia’s voters are ‘liberal,’ so there’s a pretty sizeable chunk of the electorate out there up for grabs – certainly enough to get a liberal party into the Duma.

If Yabloko and SPS, and the other smaller liberal parties can’t find it within themselves to gather up their courage and merge into one united liberal party, they will never pull in enough votes to cover their operating costs, let alone become nationally significant.

For Yabloko or SPS, it really is time to unify or die.


  • I seem to be the only person in the universe that believes this, but I don’t see why SPS and Yabloko are lumped together as “liberal” parties at all. SPS is by and large a party of big business, while the people in SPS are social democrats (in the current sense of the term) and anywhere in Western Europe would be called the Socialist Party. In fact at least a few years ago when I was paying attention to such matters Yabloko was voting with the KPRF more than it was with SPS.

    I’m going to be even more heretical here and suggest that if Yabloko were to unite with anybody, the logical choice ideologically (and possibly practically) would be the KPRF.

  • Chrisius,

    Maybe the cognitive disconnect stems from the fact that “liberal” has a variety of political connotations, depending on where you are. In the US, it generally means social democrats; in Europe it often refers to the free-marketeers, and in Russia, it’s the label pasted on those critical of Putin and the “reforms” which have taken place under this Administration. I don’t know enough to know who is doing the labelling, but is does seem to work to the benefit of “The West” at the moment…

    As an American, I do feel a little bit of Schadenfreude regarding the “liberals” being too fractured to unite in any meaningful way. Story of my life. Except we don’t even have the option of teaming up with the Communists. Not a bad idea, for those with social democratic leanings. And … I’m curious. What precisely would prevent self-funded big business “liberals” from running on the UR ticket? Not that I condone a 2 party system. I mean, just how ideologically opposed to a party with no ideology can you be? If you run on the UR ticket, do you wake up with a horse head in your bed the first time you vote against the President’s policies?

  • LOL, as russian I can only laugh at you, sorry. You americans and under-americans are so funny you know. Ah ya, regarding your topic about SPS and Yabloko: “liberals, socialists, democrats, etc” – prostitutes is the word you are looking for.


Your Header Sidebar area is currently empty. Hurry up and add some widgets.